What Are the Advantages of Electric Power Accessories？
The Pros and Cons of Using Electric Construction Equipment
The construction industry plays a crucial role in shaping our cities and infrastructure, but it also has a significant environmental impact. This industry is one of the largest emitters of greenhouse gasses, accounting for approx 38% of CO2 emissions globally. To combat this, there has been a growing focus on adopting more sustainable practices, including the use of electric construction equipment.
As technology advances, electric-powered machinery is becoming a viable alternative to traditional diesel and gas-powered equipment. In addition to the environmental benefits, electric construction equipment also offers lower operating costs, less maintenance and thus higher ROI.
Pros of Using Electric Construction Equipment
- Lower operating costs
- Reduced need for planned maintenance
- No need to warm up the engine
- No consumption when is the machine turned on and not working
- Immediate slow speed control
- Instant torque
- Better responsiveness
- Precise and controlled movements
- Lower noise
- Zero emission
- Lower vibration
Lower maintenance and operating costs
Electric construction equipment offers significant advantages in terms of both operating and maintenance costs. Firstly, electric models eliminate the need for fuel, leading to immediate cost savings. This not only reduces operational expenses but also provides insulation against fluctuating fuel prices. Unlike diesel engines that continue running even when the machine is idle, electric models automatically switch off when the operator stops the machine, minimizing unnecessary energy consumption.
Moreover, electric construction equipment boasts lower maintenance costs. The maintenance-free nature of lithium-iron batteries eliminates the need for regular maintenance tasks associated with traditional combustion engines. With fewer moving parts and simplified mechanical systems, electric machinery reduces the risk of breakdowns and the cost of sourcing and fitting replacements. This translates to lower maintenance expenses and increased uptime for construction projects.
Example: Switching to a lithium battery-powered CTC from a 25HP diesel-powered model can lead to daily savings of approximately $21.79. Utilizing the electric model for just 120 days annually, this amounts to an estimated annual savings of $337.45, without factoring in reduced maintenance costs. These estimates are based on 6 hours of daily usage and the national average US energy costs for diesel ($4.10/gal) and electricity ($0.23/kW) in the 2nd quarter of .
Instant torque and enhanced responsiveness
Another notable advantage of electric construction equipment is its ability to deliver instant torque. Fast acting electric drive motors and controls providing operator-friendly responsiveness and proportional control of the SKY functions. Unlike diesel machines that may experience a delay in power delivery, electric equipment ensures instant response.
The SKY , with its electric motors, provides the added benefit of immediate slow speed control and better responsiveness, enabling precise and controlled movements when needed.
Environmental friendliness
One of the primary advantages of electric construction equipment is its eco-friendliness. With zero emissions during operation, electric machines contribute to reducing air pollution and noise levels on job sites. This is particularly beneficial in urban areas, construction projects near residential neighborhoods, and environmentally sensitive locations.
The absence of a diesel engine significantly reduces vibrations and noise originating from combustion, exhaust, and cooling fans, creating a physically better and less stressful environment for equipment operators.
Cons of Using Electric Construction Equipment
- Limited access to the electric power
- Slower charging compared to refueling
- Higher initial investment
- Not suitable for remote jobs
- Not suitable for all jobs
Remote Areas with no access to electricity
One of the main limitations of battery powered construction equipment is its dependence on electric power. While battery technology has improved significantly, electric machines still have limited range and run time compared to their diesel counterparts. Battery-powered equipment may not be suitable for remote areas where there is no access to electricity, as recharging options may be limited. With the SKY , we offer up to 8 hours of run time, which is typically equivalent to a standard working day and the convenience of charging the machine from 110 V or 220 V outlets using standard commercial plugs.
Initial investment
The upfront cost of electric construction equipment can be higher than traditional machinery. However, it’s essential to consider the long-term savings and return on investment (ROI) that electric equipment can offer through reduced operating costs and increased efficiency. With the potential for up to 70% cost savings in maintenance and lower fuel expenses, the initial investment can be recouped over short time period.
VOLTEQ Believes in a Greener and More Productive Future with Electric Construction Equipment!
At VOLTEQ, we believe that the adoption of electric construction equipment not only benefits the environment but also translates into tangible advantages for users and operators alike. With less maintenance required, operators can dedicate more time and focus on their work, boosting productivity and efficiency on the job site.
We understand that transitioning to electric equipment might require a slight change in behavior, particularly in terms of planning for charging. However, the time saved and the improved working environment for operators are well worth the adjustment. Imagine working on a residential project without disturbing the neighbors due to the minimal noise from electric equipment, or operating within noise-sensitive zones like hospitals or schools without any disruptions. The quieter operation allows for work during early morning or late-night hours, extending the workday and enabling owners to have more billable hours.
Comments
0