Login

Your Name:(required)

Your Password:(required)

Join Us

Your Name:(required)

Your Email:(required)

Your Message :

Induction vs. Permanent Magnet Motor Efficiency

Author: Geym

Sep. 30, 2024

28 0 0

Induction vs. Permanent Magnet Motor Efficiency

Electric motor efficiency has a significant impact on the industrial, consumer, and automotive sectors. Increased efficiency leads to lower greenhouse gas emissions through a reduction in power consumption and increased range between charges - for everything from EV&#;s to your power tools. With electrification continuing to accelerate across our day-to-day living, many wonder what type of motor is best suited to meet these modern day demands.

Link to ZCL

Historically, the induction motor was the go-to motor design because it was readily available and is a longstanding, proven technology. However, the intrinsic design of the induction motor requiring a slip between rotor and stator will always limit efficiency. With recent advances in permanent magnet materials (energy density), and manufacturing, today&#;s permanent magnet motor designs take performance and energy efficiency usage to new levels not possible with the induction design.

Let&#;s take a deeper dive into both motor designs which then supports the choice of a permanent magnet design over that of the induction motor design. Equally important, understanding how Soft Magnetic Composites (SMC) can transform not only the traditional radial flux design, but new topologies that are driving tomorrows designs and performance levels with reduced heat generation and a more efficient use of copper and magnet material.

Here are a few things to consider when exploring induction vs. permanent magnet motors:

  • Cost

  • Efficiency -- torque, core losses, frequency & motor speed control

  • Material opportunities

  • Application

Permanent Magnet Motor vs. Induction Motor Efficiency

The figure below shows the general layout of both the Permanent Magnet motor (on the left) and the induction motor (on the right). In the permanent magnet design, the rotor contains a series of magnets either internal or external to the OD of the rotor. The stator is wound with copper wire creating a magnetic field that interacts with the rotors permanent magnets resulting in rotation and torque. Compare this to the induction motor where rotor and stator are traditionally stamped lamination steel with the motor windings only on the stator which induces an opposing magnetic field in the rotor. This interaction results in rotational torque.

(Comparison of AC induction motor design vs. permanent magnet motor)

Modern high torque motors whether permanent magnet or induction design use three-phase applied current. The three-phase design offers inherently better efficiency and is also self-starting. If the motor is designed to operate at a fixed rotational speed, then the number of stator poles can be adjusted to give the desired speed at the typical fixed frequency of 50 or 60 Hz. For these types of applications, the laminated induction motor is probably the most frequently chosen alternative. However, what if you want to have a variable speed motor? In this configuration, you would need to incorporate a variable frequency power supply to facilitate the variable speed. Although an induction motor would work, in this design, the permanent magnet design offers enhanced performance with greater flexibility.

The fine details of electric motor design are more complex than described below, but this is a great head start for those weighing their options between an induction and permanent magnet motor design.

Permanent Magnet Motor Efficiency

The inherent efficiency of a permanent magnet motor is higher than an induction motor &#; eliminating the intrinsic lag of the applied and induced field. Permanent magnet motor run synchronously with the applied frequency - allowing the motor to operate at a speed set by the frequency drive. As you increase the frequency,&#;total losses in induction motors will be far greater than in permanent magnet motors &#; having efficiencies up to 97.5%.

A 50 kW (about 70 HP) permanent motor typically&#;weighs less than 30 lbs. At any given frequency, the rotational speed of the permanent magnet motor is always greater than that of its induction counterpart due to the inherent slippage necessary in the induction design. The synchronous speed can be represented by the following equation:

Ns = 120 * frequency / pole count

(Ns is synchronous speed. Pole count is the total pole count per phase, including both the north and south poles)

Today, permanent magnet motors are used in applications and platforms such as - the Ford Mustang Mach-E, BMW, Ultium Platforms, Tesla, high efficiency variable frequency HVAC motors, battery powered hand tools and drones...Did you spot the trend here &#; everything that is battery powered or dependent upon high efficiency, is a 3 phase permanent magnet motor.

Induction Motors:

As noted earlier, an induction motor operates by the stator winding inducing an opposing current in the rotor (thus creating a magnetic field). That opposing field results in rotor rotation. The lag between the applied stator current and resultant rotor opposing field results in slippage between the applied field and rotation. The maximum speed of an induction motor is represented by the same equation as for the permanent magnet motor. However, inherent with induction is the requirement for slippage (asynchronous operation). As shown in the figure below, when the amount of slip in an induction motor approaches zero, the torque generated also goes to zero. Thus, it is impossible to operate an induction motor synchronously. For example, a two pole AC induction motor operating at 60 Hz will have a synchronous speed of RPM but there is typically a 5% loss in speed due to the slippage; thus, the maximum motor speed will be about / RPM. This intrinsic design characteristic limits the maximum efficiency of the induction motor to about 90- 93%.

The maximum efficiency of an induction motor is 90 / 93% whereas that of a permanent magnet motor is at 97% plus. Although a 4 to 7% improvement doesn&#;t seem like a lot - imagine the cost of operation over a 10 year or more life span and that relatively small improvement in efficiency results in a considerable energy savings with reduced greenhouse gas emissions.

Remember when we mentioned a 50 kW (about 70 HP) permanent motor typically&#;weighs less than 30 lbs? Well, the weight of a typical 75 horsepower induction motor can exceed 500 pounds! Think of the implications this has for an automobile &#; the weight reduction is significant and has a multiplying effect on the total weight of the vehicle.

Cost Vs. Performance

One major consideration in permanent magnet motors is&#;the cost of the magnets. If you&#;ve used high-energy magnets (such as iron neodymium boron), you&#;ve felt the pain in your budget (or your boss has). The potential waste of stamping the lamination material only compounds the problem.&#;

Opportunities for powder metallurgy are abundant in these types of motors. The rotors of a permanent magnet motor can be made via&#;sintered powder metal, regardless of whether you&#;re taking the internal or external design route. The stator can also be produced via soft magnetic composites. At the&#;high switching frequencies&#;expected, the losses in SMCs are lower than that of laminated 3% silicon iron,&#;further improving the efficiency of this design. Simply put, soft magnetic composites are custom-built for high frequencies.

There&#;s an opportunity for powdered metal to provide additional efficiency to a permanent magnet motor vs. an induction motor. The 3D shape-making capabilities of powder metallurgy&#;allow you to form the stator to totally encase all the wire in soft magnetic composite to eliminate end turn losses.

These are some of the many advantages that powder metal -- both sintered soft magnetic materials and SMCs -- offers.

Induction Vs. Permanent Magnet Motor Efficiency: The Winner Is...

The clear winner here is the permanent magnet motor. Now, couple the permanent magnet motor, with a unique topology enabled by Soft Magnetic Composite (SMC) technology and your motor will be lighter and more efficient, with a higher torque density and lower bill of material cost &#; all while reducing supply chain complications and using a sustainable manufacturing process.

If you need help designing the components to fully leverage the full potential of powder metallurgy for an AC or DC magnetic applications, contact us and check out our resource hub:

(Editor's note: This article was originally published in April and was updated on November 29, and July 27, )

Induction motor

Type of AC electric motor

"Tesla motor" redirects here. For the electric car company, see Tesla, Inc.

Three-phase totally-enclosed fan-cooled (TEFC) induction motor with end cover on the left, and without end cover to show cooling fan on the right. In TEFC motors, interior heat losses are dissipated indirectly through enclosure fins, mostly by forced air convection. Cutaway view through stator of TEFC induction motor, showing rotor with internal air circulation vanes. Many such motors have a symmetric armature, and the frame may be reversed to place the electrical connection box (not shown) on the opposite side.

An induction motor or asynchronous motor is an AC electric motor in which the electric current in the rotor that produces torque is obtained by electromagnetic induction from the magnetic field of the stator winding.[1] An induction motor therefore needs no electrical connections to the rotor.[a] An induction motor's rotor can be either wound type or squirrel-cage type.

Three-phase squirrel-cage induction motors are widely used as industrial drives because they are self-starting, reliable, and economical. Single-phase induction motors are used extensively for smaller loads, such as garbage disposals and stationary power tools. Although traditionally used for constant-speed service, single- and three-phase induction motors are increasingly being installed in variable-speed applications using variable-frequency drives (VFD). VFD offers energy savings opportunities for induction motors in applications like fans, pumps, and compressors that have a variable load.

History

[

edit

]

A model of Nikola Tesla's first induction motor at the Tesla Museum in Belgrade, Serbia Squirrel-cage rotor construction, showing only the center three laminations

In , the French physicist François Arago formulated the existence of rotating magnetic fields, termed Arago's rotations. By manually turning switches on and off, Walter Baily demonstrated this in , effectively the first primitive induction motor.[2][3][4][5][6][7][8]

The first commutator-free single-phase AC induction motor was invented by Hungarian engineer Ottó Bláthy; he used the single-phase motor to propel his invention, the electricity meter.[9][10]

The first AC commutator-free polyphase induction motors were independently invented by Galileo Ferraris and Nikola Tesla, a working motor model having been demonstrated by the former in and by the latter in . Tesla applied for US patents in October and November and was granted some of these patents in May . In April , the Royal Academy of Science of Turin published Ferraris's research on his AC polyphase motor detailing the foundations of motor operation.[5][11] In May Tesla presented the technical paper A New System for Alternating Current Motors and Transformers to the American Institute of Electrical Engineers (AIEE)[12][13][14][15] [16] describing three four-stator-pole motor types: one having a four-pole rotor forming a non-self-starting reluctance motor, another with a wound rotor forming a self-starting induction motor, and the third a true synchronous motor with a separately excited DC supply to the rotor winding.

George Westinghouse, who was developing an alternating current power system at that time, licensed Tesla's patents in and purchased a US patent option on Ferraris' induction motor concept.[17] Tesla was also employed for one year as a consultant. Westinghouse employee C. F. Scott was assigned to assist Tesla and later took over development of the induction motor at Westinghouse.[12][18][19][20] Steadfast in his promotion of three-phase development, Mikhail Dolivo-Dobrovolsky invented the cage-rotor induction motor in and the three-limb transformer in .[21][22] Furthermore, he claimed that Tesla's motor was not practical because of two-phase pulsations, which prompted him to persist in his three-phase work.[23] Although Westinghouse achieved its first practical induction motor in and developed a line of polyphase 60 hertz induction motors in , these early Westinghouse motors were two-phase motors with wound rotors until B. G. Lamme developed a rotating bar winding rotor.[12]

The General Electric Company (GE) began developing three-phase induction motors in .[12] By , General Electric and Westinghouse signed a cross-licensing agreement for the bar-winding-rotor design, later called the squirrel-cage rotor.[12] Arthur E. Kennelly was the first to bring out the full significance of complex numbers (using j to represent the square root of minus one) to designate the 90º rotation operator in analysis of AC problems.[24] GE's Charles Proteus Steinmetz improved the application of AC complex quantities and developed an analytical model called the induction motor Steinmetz equivalent circuit.[12][25][26][27]

Induction motor improvements flowing from these inventions and innovations were such that a modern 100-horsepower induction motor has the same mounting dimensions as a 7.5-horsepower motor in .[12]

Principle

[

edit

]

3-phase motor

[

edit

]

A three-phase power supply provides a rotating magnetic field in an induction motor. Inherent slip &#; unequal rotation frequency of stator field and the rotor

In both induction and synchronous motors, the AC power supplied to the motor's stator creates a magnetic field that rotates in synchronism with the AC oscillations. Whereas a synchronous motor's rotor turns at the same rate as the stator field, an induction motor's rotor rotates at a somewhat slower speed than the stator field. The induction motor stator's magnetic field is therefore changing or rotating relative to the rotor. This induces an opposing current in the rotor, in effect the motor's secondary winding.[28] The rotating magnetic flux induces currents in the rotor windings,[29] in a manner similar to currents induced in a transformer's secondary winding(s).

The induced currents in the rotor windings in turn create magnetic fields in the rotor that react against the stator field. The direction of the rotor magnetic field opposes the change in current through the rotor windings, following Lenz's Law. The cause of induced current in the rotor windings is the rotating stator magnetic field, so to oppose the change in rotor-winding currents the rotor turns in the direction of the stator magnetic field. The rotor accelerates until the magnitude of induced rotor current and torque balances the load on the rotor. Since rotation at synchronous speed does not induce rotor current, an induction motor always operates slightly slower than synchronous speed. The difference, or "slip," between actual and synchronous speed varies from about 0.5% to 5.0% for standard Design B torque curve induction motors.[30] The induction motor's essential character is that torque is created solely by induction instead of the rotor being separately excited as in synchronous or DC machines or being self-magnetized as in permanent magnet motors.[28]

For rotor currents to be induced, the speed of the physical rotor must be lower than that of the stator's rotating magnetic field ( n s {\displaystyle n_{s}} ); otherwise the magnetic field would not be moving relative to the rotor conductors and no currents would be induced. As the speed of the rotor drops below synchronous speed, the rotation rate of the magnetic field in the rotor increases, inducing more current in the windings and creating more torque. The ratio between the rotation rate of the magnetic field induced in the rotor and the rotation rate of the stator's rotating field is called "slip". Under load, the speed drops and the slip increases enough to create sufficient torque to turn the load. For this reason, induction motors are sometimes referred to as "asynchronous motors".[31]

An induction motor can be used as an induction generator, or it can be unrolled to form a linear induction motor which can directly generate linear motion. The generating mode for induction motors is complicated by the need to excite the rotor, which begins with only residual magnetization. In some cases, that residual magnetization is enough to self-excite the motor under load. Therefore, it is necessary to either snap the motor and connect it momentarily to a live grid or to add capacitors charged initially by residual magnetism and providing the required reactive power during operation. Similar is the operation of the induction motor in parallel with a synchronous motor serving as a power factor compensator. A feature in the generator mode in parallel to the grid is that the rotor speed is higher than in the driving mode. Then active energy is being given to the grid.[2] Another disadvantage of the induction motor generator is that it consumes a significant magnetizing current I0 = (20&#;35)%.

Synchronous speed

[

edit

]

An AC motor's synchronous speed, f s {\displaystyle f_{s}} , is the rotation rate of the stator's magnetic field,

f s = 2 f p {\displaystyle f_{s}={2f \over p}}

where f {\displaystyle f} is the frequency of the power supply, p {\displaystyle p} is the number of magnetic poles, and f s {\displaystyle f_{s}} is the synchronous speed of the machine. For f {\displaystyle f} in hertz and n s {\displaystyle n_{s}} synchronous speed in RPM, the formula becomes:

n s = 2 f p &#; ( 60   s e c o n d s m i n u t e ) = 120 f p &#; ( s e c o n d s m i n u t e ) {\displaystyle n_{s}={2f \over p}\cdot \left({\frac {60\ \mathrm {seconds} }{\mathrm {minute} }}\right)={120f \over {p}}\cdot \left({\frac {\mathrm {seconds} }{\mathrm {minute} }}\right)}

[

32

]

[

33

]

For example, for a four-pole, three-phase motor, p {\displaystyle p} = 4 and n s = 120 f 4 {\displaystyle n_{s}={120f \over 4}} = 1,500 RPM (for f {\displaystyle f} = 50 Hz) and 1,800 RPM (for f {\displaystyle f} = 60 Hz) synchronous speed.

The number of magnetic poles, p {\displaystyle p} , is the number of north and south poles per phase. For example; a single-phase motor with 3 north and 3 south poles, having 6 poles per phase, is a 6-pole motor. A three-phase motor with 18 north and 18 south poles, having 6 poles per phase, is also a 6-pole motor. This industry standard method of counting poles results in the same synchronous speed for a given frequency regardless of polarity.

Slip

[

edit

]

Typical torque curve as a function of slip, represented as "g" here

Slip, s {\displaystyle s} , is defined as the difference between synchronous speed and operating speed, at the same frequency, expressed in rpm, or in percentage or ratio of synchronous speed. Thus

s = n s &#; n r n s {\displaystyle s={\frac {n_{s}-n_{r}}{n_{s}}}\,}

where n s {\displaystyle n_{s}} is stator electrical speed, n r {\displaystyle n_{r}} is rotor mechanical speed.[34][35] Slip, which varies from zero at synchronous speed and 1 when the rotor is stalled, determines the motor's torque. Since the short-circuited rotor windings have small resistance, even a small slip induces a large current in the rotor and produces significant torque.[36] At full rated load, slip varies from more than 5% for small or special purpose motors to less than 1% for large motors.[37] These speed variations can cause load-sharing problems when differently sized motors are mechanically connected.[37] Various methods are available to reduce slip, VFDs often offering the best solution.[37]

Torque

[

edit

]

Standard torque

[

edit

]

Speed-torque curves for four induction motor types: A) Single-phase, B) Polyphase cage, C) Polyphase cage deep bar, D) Polyphase double cage Typical speed-torque curve for NEMA Design B Motor

Transient solution for an AC induction motor from a complete stop to its operating point under a varying load

The typical speed-torque relationship of a standard NEMA Design B polyphase induction motor is as shown in the curve at right. Suitable for most low performance loads such as centrifugal pumps and fans, Design B motors are constrained by the following typical torque ranges:[30][b]

  • Breakdown torque (peak torque), 175&#;300% of rated torque
  • Locked-rotor torque (torque at 100% slip), 75&#;275% of rated torque
  • Pull-up torque, 65&#;190% of rated torque.

Over a motor's normal load range, the torque's slope is approximately linear or proportional to slip because the value of rotor resistance divided by slip, R r &#; / s {\displaystyle R_{r}'/s} , dominates torque in a linear manner.[38] As load increases above rated load, stator and rotor leakage reactance factors gradually become more significant in relation to R r &#; / s {\displaystyle R_{r}'/s} such that torque gradually curves towards breakdown torque. As the load torque increases beyond breakdown torque the motor stalls.

Starting

[

edit

]

There are three basic types of small induction motors: split-phase single-phase, shaded-pole single-phase, and polyphase.

In two-pole single-phase motors, the torque goes to zero at 100% slip (zero speed), so these require alterations to the stator such as shaded-poles to provide starting torque. A single phase induction motor requires separate starting circuitry to provide a rotating field to the motor. The normal running windings within such a single-phase motor can cause the rotor to turn in either direction, so the starting circuit determines the operating direction.

Magnetic flux in shaded pole motor

In certain smaller single-phase motors, starting is done by means of a copper wire turn around part of a pole; such a pole is referred to as a shaded pole. The current induced in this turn lags behind the supply current, creating a delayed magnetic field around the shaded part of the pole face. This imparts sufficient rotational field energy to start the motor. These motors are typically used in applications such as desk fans and record players, as the required starting torque is low, and the low efficiency is tolerable relative to the reduced cost of the motor and starting method compared to other AC motor designs.

Larger single phase motors are split-phase motors and have a second stator winding fed with out-of-phase current; such currents may be created by feeding the winding through a capacitor or having it receive different values of inductance and resistance from the main winding. In capacitor-start designs, the second winding is disconnected once the motor is up to speed, usually either by a centrifugal switch acting on weights on the motor shaft or a thermistor which heats up and increases its resistance, reducing the current through the second winding to an insignificant level. The capacitor-run designs keep the second winding on when running, improving torque. A resistance start design uses a starter inserted in series with the startup winding, creating reactance.

Self-starting polyphase induction motors produce torque even at standstill. Available squirrel-cage induction motor starting methods include direct-on-line starting, reduced-voltage reactor or auto-transformer starting, star-delta starting or, increasingly, new solid-state soft assemblies and, of course, variable frequency drives (VFDs).[39]

Polyphase motors have rotor bars shaped to give different speed-torque characteristics. The current distribution within the rotor bars varies depending on the frequency of the induced current. At standstill, the rotor current is the same frequency as the stator current, and tends to travel at the outermost parts of the cage rotor bars (by skin effect). The different bar shapes can give usefully different speed-torque characteristics as well as some control over the inrush current at startup.

Although polyphase motors are inherently self-starting, their starting and pull-up torque design limits must be high enough to overcome actual load conditions.

In wound rotor motors, rotor circuit connection through slip rings to external resistances allows change of speed-torque characteristics for acceleration control and speed control purposes.

Speed control

[

edit

]

Resistance

[

edit

]

Typical speed-torque curves for different motor input frequencies as for example used with variable-frequency drives

Before the development of semiconductor power electronics, it was difficult to vary the frequency, and cage induction motors were mainly used in fixed speed applications. Applications such as electric overhead cranes used DC drives or wound rotor motors (WRIM) with slip rings for rotor circuit connection to variable external resistance allowing considerable range of speed control. However, resistor losses associated with low speed operation of WRIMs is a major cost disadvantage, especially for constant loads.[40] Large slip ring motor drives, termed slip energy recovery systems, some still in use, recover energy from the rotor circuit, rectify it, and return it to the power system using a VFD.

Cascade

[

edit

]

The speed of a pair of slip-ring motors can be controlled by a cascade connection, or concatenation. The rotor of one motor is connected to the stator of the other.[citation needed] If the two motors are also mechanically connected, they will run at half speed. This system was once widely used in three-phase AC railway locomotives, such as FS Class E.333. By the turn of this century, however, such cascade-based electromechanical systems became much more efficiently and economically solved using power semiconductor elements solutions.[41]

Variable-frequency drive

[

edit

]

In many industrial variable-speed applications, DC and WRIM drives are being displaced by VFD-fed cage induction motors. The most common efficient way to control asynchronous motor speed of many loads is with VFDs. Barriers to adoption of VFDs due to cost and reliability considerations have been reduced considerably over the past three decades such that it is estimated that drive technology is adopted in as many as 30&#;40% of all newly installed motors.[42]

Variable frequency drives implement the scalar or vector control of an induction motor.

With scalar control, only the magnitude and frequency of the supply voltage are controlled without phase control (absent feedback by rotor position). Scalar control is suitable for application where the load is constant.

Vector control allows independent control of the speed and torque of the motor, making it possible to maintain a constant rotation speed at varying load torque. But vector control is more expensive because of the cost of the sensor (not always) and the requirement for a more powerful controller.[43]

Construction

[

edit

]

Typical winding pattern for a three-phase (U, W, V), four-pole motor. Note the interleaving of the pole windings and the resulting quadrupole field.

The stator of an induction motor consists of poles carrying supply current to induce a magnetic field that penetrates the rotor. To optimize the distribution of the magnetic field, windings are distributed in slots around the stator, with the magnetic field having the same number of north and south poles. Induction motors are most commonly run on single-phase or three-phase power, but two-phase motors exist; in theory, induction motors can have any number of phases. Many single-phase motors having two windings can be viewed as two-phase motors, since a capacitor is used to generate a second power phase 90° from the single-phase supply and feeds it to the second motor winding. Single-phase motors require some mechanism to produce a rotating field on startup. Induction motors using a squirrel-cage rotor winding may have the rotor bars skewed slightly to smooth out torque in each revolution.

Standardized NEMA & IEC motor frame sizes throughout the industry result in interchangeable dimensions for shaft, foot mounting, general aspects as well as certain motor flange aspect. Since an open, drip proof (ODP) motor design allows a free air exchange from outside to the inner stator windings, this style of motor tends to be slightly more efficient because the windings are cooler. At a given power rating, lower speed requires a larger frame.[44]

Rotation reversal

[

edit

]

The method of changing the direction of rotation of an induction motor depends on whether it is a three-phase or single-phase machine. A three-phase motor can be reversed by swapping any two of its phase connections. Motors required to change direction regularly (such as hoists) will have extra switching contacts in their controller to reverse rotation as needed. A variable frequency drive nearly always permits reversal by electronically changing the phase sequence of voltage applied to the motor.

In a single-phase split-phase motor, reversal is achieved by reversing the connections of the starting winding. Some motors bring out the start winding connections to allow selection of rotation direction at installation. If the start winding is permanently connected within the motor, it is impractical to reverse the sense of rotation. Single-phase shaded-pole motors have a fixed rotation unless a second set of shading windings is provided.

Power factor

[

edit

]

The power factor of induction motors varies with load, typically from about 0.85 or 0.90 at full load to as low as about 0.20 at no-load,[39] due to stator and rotor leakage and magnetizing reactances.[45] Power factor can be improved by connecting capacitors either on an individual motor basis or, by preference, on a common bus covering several motors. For economic and other considerations, power systems are rarely power factor corrected to unity power factor.[46] Power capacitor application with harmonic currents requires power system analysis to avoid harmonic resonance between capacitors and transformer and circuit reactances.[47] Common bus power factor correction is recommended to minimize resonant risk and to simplify power system analysis.[47]

Efficiency

[

edit

]

Full-load motor efficiency ranges from 85&#;97%, with losses as follows:[48]

  • Friction and windage, 5&#;15%
  • Iron or core losses, 15&#;25%
  • Stator losses, 25&#;40%
  • Rotor losses, 15&#;25%
  • Stray load losses, 10&#;20%.

For an electric motor, the efficiency, represented by the Greek letter Eta,[49] is defined as the quotient of the mechanical output power and the electric input power,[50] calculated using this formula:

η = O u t p u t M e c h a n i c a l P o w e r ÷ I n p u t E l e c t r i c a l P o w e r {\displaystyle \eta =OutputMechanicalPower\div InputElectricalPower}

Regulatory authorities in many countries have implemented legislation to encourage the manufacture and use of higher efficiency electric motors. Some legislation mandates the future use of premium-efficiency induction motors in certain equipment. For more information, see: Premium efficiency.

Steinmetz equivalent circuit

[

edit

]

Many useful motor relationships between time, current, voltage, speed, power factor, and torque can be obtained from analysis of the Steinmetz equivalent circuit (also termed T-equivalent circuit or IEEE recommended equivalent circuit), a mathematical model used to describe how an induction motor's electrical input is transformed into useful mechanical energy output. The equivalent circuit is a single-phase representation of a multiphase induction motor that is valid in steady-state balanced-load conditions.

The Steinmetz equivalent circuit is expressed simply in terms of the following components:

Are you interested in learning more about Asynchronous Motor Efficiency? Contact us today to secure an expert consultation!

  • Stator resistance and leakage reactance (

    R s {\displaystyle R_{s}}

    X s {\displaystyle X_{s}}

  • Rotor resistance, leakage reactance, and slip (

    R r {\displaystyle R_{r}}

    X r {\displaystyle X_{r}}

    R r &#; {\displaystyle R_{r}'}

    X r &#; {\displaystyle X_{r}'}

    s {\displaystyle s}

  • Magnetizing reactance (

    X m {\displaystyle X_{m}}

Paraphrasing from Alger in Knowlton, an induction motor is simply an electrical transformer the magnetic circuit of which is separated by an air gap between the stator winding and the moving rotor winding.[28] The equivalent circuit can accordingly be shown either with equivalent circuit components of respective windings separated by an ideal transformer or with rotor components referred to the stator side as shown in the following circuit and associated equation and parameter definition tables.[39][46][51][52][53][54]

Steinmetz equivalent circuit

The following rule-of-thumb approximations apply to the circuit:[54][55][56]

  • Maximum current happens under locked rotor current (LRC) conditions and is somewhat less than

    V s / X {\displaystyle V_{\text{s}}/X}

    [

    30

    ]

  • Breakdown torque

    T max {\displaystyle T_{\text{max}}}

    s &#; R r &#; / X {\displaystyle s\approx R_{\text{r}}'/X}

    I s &#; 0.7 L R C {\displaystyle I_{\text{s}}\approx 0.7\;LRC}

    T max &#; K V s 2 / 2 X {\displaystyle T_{\text{max}}\approx KV_{\text{s}}^{2}/2X}

  • The relative stator to rotor leakage reactance of standard Design B cage induction motors is

    [

    57

    ]

    X s X r &#; &#; 0.4 0.6 {\displaystyle {\frac {X_{\text{s}}}{X_{\text{r}}'}}\approx {\frac {0.4}{0.6}}}

  • Neglecting stator resistance, an induction motor's torque curve reduces to the Kloss equation

    [

    58

    ]

    T em &#; 2 T max s s max + s max s {\displaystyle T_{\text{em}}\approx {\frac {2T_{\text{max}}}{{\frac {s}{s_{\text{max}}}}+{\frac {s_{\text{max}}}{s}}}}}

    s max {\displaystyle s_{\text{max}}}

    T max {\displaystyle T_{\text{max}}}

Circuit parameter definitions Units

f {\displaystyle f}

stator source frequency Hz

f s {\displaystyle f_{\text{s}}}

stator synchronous frequency Hz

n r {\displaystyle n_{\text{r}}}

rotor speed in revolutions per minute rpm

n s {\displaystyle n_{\text{s}}}

synchronous speed in revolutions per minute rpm

I s {\displaystyle I_{\text{s}}}

stator or primary current A

I r &#; {\displaystyle I_{\text{r}}'}

rotor or secondary current referred to stator side A

I m {\displaystyle I_{\text{m}}}

magnetizing current A

j = &#; 1 {\displaystyle j={\sqrt {-1}}}

imaginary number, or 90° rotation, operator

K TE {\displaystyle K_{\text{TE}}}

= X m / ( X s + X m ) {\displaystyle =X_{m}/\left(X_{s}+X_{m}\right)}

Thévenin reactance factor

m {\displaystyle m}

number of motor phases

p {\displaystyle p}

number of motor poles

P em {\displaystyle P_{\text{em}}}

electromechanical power W or hp

P gap {\displaystyle P_{\text{gap}}}

air gap power W

P r {\displaystyle P_{\text{r}}}

rotor copper losses W

P o {\displaystyle P_{\text{o}}}

input power W

P h {\displaystyle P_{\text{h}}}

core loss W

P f {\displaystyle P_{\text{f}}}

friction and windage loss W

P rl {\displaystyle P_{\text{rl}}}

running light watts input W

P sl {\displaystyle P_{\text{sl}}}

stray-load loss W

R s , X s {\displaystyle R_{\text{s}},X_{\text{s}}}

stator or primary resistance and leakage reactance Ω

R r &#; , X r &#; {\displaystyle R_{\text{r}}',X_{\text{r}}'}

rotor or secondary resistance & leakage reactance referred to the stator side Ω

R o , X o {\displaystyle R_{\text{o}},X_{\text{o}}}

resistance & leakage reactance at motor input Ω

R TE , X TE {\displaystyle R_{\text{TE}},X_{\text{TE}}}

Thévenin equivalent resistance & leakage reactance combining

R s , X s {\displaystyle R_{\text{s}},X_{\text{s}}}

X m {\displaystyle X_{m}}

Ω

s {\displaystyle s}

slip

T em {\displaystyle T_{\text{em}}}

electromagnetic torque Nm or ft-lb

T max {\displaystyle T_{\text{max}}}

breakdown torque Nm or ft-lb

V s {\displaystyle V_{\text{s}}}

impressed stator phase voltage V

X m {\displaystyle X_{\text{m}}}

magnetizing reactance Ω

X {\displaystyle X}

X s + X r &#; {\displaystyle X_{s}+X_{r}'}

Ω

Z s {\displaystyle Z_{\text{s}}}

stator or primary impedance Ω

Z r &#; {\displaystyle Z_{\text{r}}'}

rotor or secondary impedance referred to the primary Ω

Z o {\displaystyle Z_{\text{o}}}

impedance at motor stator or primary input Ω

Z {\displaystyle Z}

combined rotor or secondary and magnetizing impedance Ω

Z TE {\displaystyle Z_{\text{TE}}}

Thévenin equivalent circuit impedance,

R TE + X TE {\displaystyle R_{\text{TE}}+X_{\text{TE}}}

Ω

ω r {\displaystyle \omega _{\text{r}}}

rotor speed rad/s

ω s {\displaystyle \omega _{\text{s}}}

synchronous speed rad/s

Y {\displaystyle Y}

= G + j B = 1 Z = 1 R + j X = R Z 2 &#; j X Z 2 {\displaystyle =G+jB={\frac {1}{Z}}={\frac {1}{R+jX}}={\frac {R}{Z^{2}}}-{\frac {jX}{Z^{2}}}}

S or Ʊ

| Z | {\displaystyle \left\vert Z\right\vert }

R 2 + X 2 {\displaystyle {\sqrt {R^{2}+X^{2}}}}

Ω Basic electrical equations

ω s = 2 π n s 60 = 2 π f s = 4 π f p {\displaystyle \omega _{\text{s}}={\frac {2\pi n_{\text{s}}}{60}}=2\pi f_{\text{s}}={\frac {4\pi f}{p}}}

Motor input equivalent impedance

Z m = R s + j X s + ( 1 s R r &#; + j X r &#; ) j X m 1 s R r &#; + j ( X r &#; + X m ) {\displaystyle Z_{\text{m}}=R_{\text{s}}+jX_{\text{s}}+{\frac {\left({\frac {1}{s}}R_{\text{r}}'+jX_{r}'\right)jX_{\text{m}}}{{\frac {1}{s}}R_{\text{r}}'+j\left(X_{\text{r}}'+X_{\text{m}}\right)}}}

Stator current

I s = V s / Z m = V s / ( R s + j X s + ( 1 s R r &#; + j X r &#; ) j X m 1 s R r &#; + j ( X r &#; + X m ) ) {\displaystyle I_{\text{s}}=V_{\text{s}}/Z_{\text{m}}=V_{\text{s}}/\left(R_{\text{s}}+jX_{\text{s}}+{\frac {\left({\frac {1}{s}}R_{\text{r}}'+jX_{\text{r}}'\right)jX_{\text{m}}}{{\frac {1}{s}}R_{\text{r}}'+j\left(X_{\text{r}}'+X_{m}\right)}}\right)}

Rotor current referred to the stator side in terms of stator current

I r &#; = j X m 1 s R r &#; + j ( X r &#; + X m ) I s {\displaystyle I_{\text{r}}'={\frac {jX_{m}}{{\frac {1}{s}}R_{\text{r}}'+j\left(X_{\text{r}}'+X_{\text{m}}\right)}}I_{\text{s}}}

Power equations

From Steinmetz equivalent circuit, we have

1 s R r &#; = R r &#; 1 &#; s s + R r &#; {\displaystyle {\frac {1}{s}}R_{\text{r}}'=R_{\text{r}}'{\frac {1-s}{s}}+R_{\text{r}}'}

That is, air gap power is equal to electromechanical power output plus rotor copper losses

P gap = P em + P r P r = 3 R r &#; I r &#; 2 P gap = 3 R r &#; I r &#; 2 s P em = 3 R r &#; I r &#; 2 1 &#; s s P em = P gap ( 1 &#; s ) {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}P_{\text{gap}}&=P_{\text{em}}+P_{r}\\P_{r}&=3R_{\text{r}}'I_{\text{r}}^{\prime 2}\\P_{\text{gap}}&={\frac {3R_{\text{r}}'I_{\text{r}}^{\prime 2}}{s}}\\P_{\text{em}}&=3R_{\text{r}}'I_{\text{r}}^{\prime 2}{\frac {1-s}{s}}\\P_{\text{em}}&=P_{\text{gap}}(1-s)\end{aligned}}}

Expressing electromechanical power output in terms of rotor speed

P em = 3 R r &#; I r &#; 2 n r s n s {\displaystyle P_{\text{em}}={\frac {3R_{\text{r}}'I_{\text{r}}^{\prime 2}n_{\text{r}}}{sn_{\text{s}}}}}

P em = 3 R r &#; I r &#; 2 n r 746 s n s {\displaystyle P_{\text{em}}={\frac {3R_{\text{r}}'I_{\text{r}}^{\prime 2}n_{\text{r}}}{746\;sn_{\text{s}}}}}

Expressing T em {\displaystyle T_{\text{em}}} in ft-lb:

P em = T em n r {\displaystyle P_{\text{em}}={\frac {T_{\text{em}}n_{\text{r}}}{}}}

Torque equations

T em = P em ω r = P r s ω s = 3 I r &#; 2 R r &#; ω s s {\displaystyle T_{\text{em}}={\frac {P_{\text{em}}}{\omega _{r}}}={\frac {\frac {P_{\text{r}}}{s}}{\omega _{s}}}={\frac {3I_{\text{r}}^{\prime 2}R_{\text{r}}'}{\omega _{\text{s}}s}}}

In order to be able to express T em {\displaystyle T_{\text{em}}} directly in terms of s {\displaystyle s} , IEEE recommends that R s , X s {\displaystyle R_{\text{s}},X_{\text{s}}} and X m {\displaystyle X_{\text{m}}} be converted to the Thévenin equivalent circuit

IEEE recommended Thévenin equivalent circuit

where

V TE = X m R s 2 + ( X s + X m ) 2 V s {\displaystyle V_{\text{TE}}={\frac {X_{\text{m}}}{\sqrt {R_{\text{s}}^{2}+(X_{\text{s}}+X_{\text{m}})^{2}}}}V_{\text{s}}}

Z TE = R TE + j X TE = j X m ( R s + j X s ) R s + j ( X s + X m ) {\displaystyle Z_{\text{TE}}=R_{\text{TE}}+jX_{\text{TE}}={\frac {jX_{\text{m}}\left(R_{\text{s}}+jX_{\text{s}}\right)}{R_{\text{s}}+j\left(X_{\text{s}}+X_{\text{m}}\right)}}}

Since R s 2 &#; ( X s + X m ) 2 {\displaystyle R_{\text{s}}^{2}\gg {\left(X_{\text{s}}+X_{\text{m}}\right)^{2}}} and X s &#; X m {\displaystyle X_{\text{s}}\ll X_{\text{m}}} , and letting K TE = X m X s + X m {\displaystyle K_{\text{TE}}={\frac {X_{\text{m}}}{X_{\text{s}}+X_{\text{m}}}}}

V TE &#; Z TE V s {\displaystyle V_{\text{TE}}\approx Z_{\text{TE}}V_{\text{s}}}

Z TE &#; K TE 2 R s + j X s {\displaystyle Z_{\text{TE}}\approx K_{\text{TE}}^{2}R_{\text{s}}+jX_{\text{s}}}

[

56

]

T em = 3 V TE 2 ( R TE + 1 s R r &#; ) 2 + ( X TE + X r &#; ) 2 &#; 1 s R r &#; &#; 1 ω s {\displaystyle T_{\text{em}}={\frac {3V_{\text{TE}}^{2}}{\left(R_{\text{TE}}+{\frac {1}{s}}R_{\text{r}}'\right)^{2}+\left(X_{\text{TE}}+X_{r}'\right)^{2}}}\cdot {\frac {1}{s}}R_{\text{r}}'\cdot {\frac {1}{\omega _{\text{s}}}}}

[

56

]

For low values of slip:

Since

R TE + R r &#; &#; R TE + X r &#; {\displaystyle R_{\text{TE}}+R_{\text{r}}'\gg R_{\text{TE}}+X_{\text{r}}'}

R r &#; &#; R TE {\displaystyle R_{\text{r}}'\gg R_{\text{TE}}}

T em &#; 1 ω s &#; 3 V TE 2 R r &#; s {\displaystyle T_{\text{em}}\approx {\frac {1}{\omega _{\text{s}}}}\cdot {\frac {3V_{\text{TE}}^{2}}{R_{\text{r}}'}}s}

For high values of slip

Since

R TE + R r &#; &#; R TE + X r &#; {\displaystyle R_{\text{TE}}+R_{r}'\ll R_{\text{TE}}+X_{r}'}

T em &#; 1 ω s &#; 3 V TE 2 ( X s + X r &#; ) 2 &#; R r &#; 2 s {\displaystyle T_{\text{em}}\approx {\frac {1}{\omega _{\text{s}}}}\cdot {\frac {3V_{\text{TE}}^{2}}{\left(X_{\text{s}}+X_{\text{r}}'\right)^{2}}}\cdot {\frac {R_{\text{r}}^{\prime 2}}{s}}}

For maximum or breakdown torque, which is independent of rotor resistance

T max = 1 2 ω s &#; 3 V TE 2 R TE + R TE 2 + ( X TE + X r &#; ) 2 {\displaystyle T_{\text{max}}={\frac {1}{2\omega _{s}}}\cdot {\frac {3V_{\text{TE}}^{2}}{R_{\text{TE}}+{\sqrt {R_{\text{TE}}^{2}+(X_{\text{TE}}+X_{\text{r}}')^{2}}}}}}

[

56

]

Corresponding slip at maximum or breakdown torque is

s = R r &#; R TE 2 + ( X TE + X r &#; ) 2 {\displaystyle s={\frac {R_{\text{r}}'}{\sqrt {R_{\text{TE}}^{2}+\left(X_{\text{TE}}+X_{\text{r}}'\right)^{2}}}}}

[

56

]

In foot-pound units

T em = 21.21 I r &#; 2 R r &#; n r s {\displaystyle T_{\text{em}}={\frac {21.21\;I_{r}^{\prime 2}R_{\text{r}}'}{n_{\text{r}}s}}}

T em = 7.04 P gap n s {\displaystyle T_{\text{em}}={\frac {7.04\;P_{\text{gap}}}{n_{\text{s}}}}}

Linear induction motor

[

edit

]

Linear induction motors, which work on the same general principles as rotary induction motors (frequently three-phase), are designed to produce straight line motion. Uses include magnetic levitation, linear propulsion, linear actuators, and liquid metal pumping.[59]

See also

[

edit

]

Notes

[

edit

]

  1. ^

    That is, no mechanical commutation , separate-excitation or self-excitation for all or part of the energy transferred from stator to rotor as found in universal DC and synchronous motors.

  2. ^

    NEMA MG-1 defines a) breakdown torque as the maximum torque developed by the motor with rated voltage applied at rated frequency without an abrupt drop in speed, b) locked-rotor torque as the minimum torque developed by the motor at rest with rated voltage applied at rated frequency, and c) pull-up torque as the minimum torque developed by the motor during the period of acceleration from rest to the speed at which breakdown torque occurs.

References

[

edit

]

Classical sources

[

edit

]

Contact us to discuss your requirements of Permanent Magnet Ac Motors. Our experienced sales team can help you identify the options that best suit your needs.

Comments

0

0/2000