Drugs may be distributed in a variety of primary (innermost, touching the drug) and secondary (outermost, visible to the user) pharmaceutical packaging, depending on the requirements of the drug itself and the intended end-user.
You will get efficient and thoughtful service from Xiangyi.
Pharmaceutical Packaging. Image Credit: Mr.1/Shutterstock.com
Drugs may be in the liquid, solid, or gas phase, and packaging must accommodate the specific long term storage needs of the drug. In the past, most drugs were provided in liquid form and dispensed by pharmacists in hospitals, though more recently solid dosage forms that are more appealing to patients have become commonplace.
Additionally, the competition between over-the-counter drug companies has led to an increase in the variety, size, and visual appeal of packaging. Importantly, usage-dose packaging has become the standard for many drugs, significantly lessening the occurrence of dosage errors. Many packaging requirements are dependent on region, with labeling, material testing, tamper-proofing, quality control, and other factors being mandated by law.
Bottles, jars, and tubes
Glass is tough, transparent, inert, can be made to any size bottle, offers good temperature stability, and can be colored, allowing for protection of drugs from light. However, glass is also brittle, heavy, and relatively expensive, so drugs are less commonly distributed and stored in glass bottles than in the previous century, many being replaced with plastic.
Thicker creams and ointments are usually contained in plastic or aluminum tubes for ease of use, or specialized pump-bottles for larger volumes. Plastic is durable and more easily manufactured than glass, but may suffer from leaching, particularly when containing liquid drugs. For this reason, many syrups and other liquid drugs are still distributed in glass bottles and vials.
Glass for medical containers falls under three categories: type 1 is the most resilient, made from borosilicate glass, it is suitable for vials, bottles, and ampoules. Type 2 glass could be borosilicate or soda-lime-silica but is coated with a resistant surface by removal of sodium ions from the glass. It is generally suitable for the storage of mild aqueous solutions. Type 3 glass is usually made from soda-lime-silica and is the least resistant. It is generally suitable for storing non-aqueous solutions and powders.
Ampoules
Many drugs, both solid and liquid, may also be distributed in a special type of glass vial called an ampoule. Ampoules are usually used to contain air-sensitive drugs and chemicals, or those where sterility and an inert container are imperative. Gasses can also be stored in ampoules, or the ampoule can be pressurized with a particular gas to enhance the stability of the solid or liquid drug. The glass of the ampoule can also be modified to filter out harmful UV light.
Ampoules often bear color-coded rings around their necks that aid in identification should they be removed from their secondary packaging, and also often present a dot on the neck that aids with thumb alignment when breaking the ampoule. Glass ampoules have been criticized due to the inherent risk of small glass shards entering the fluid and being administered to a patient intravenously.
This problem has been somewhat alleviated by modern ampoule design, but many studies demonstrate that small fragments are still released upon breaking, correlating with ampoule size and wall thickness. Drugs are often filtered before being administered, but the smallest glass particles can still make it through and are treated by the body as foreign invaders.
Sachets
If the drug is solid in the form of a powder then it may be distributed to users in a sachet, usually pre-prepared at the suitable administration dose. Like ampoules, sachets may be purged with noble gas to aid product stability. They are usually made from a mixture of paper and foil and may be printed into large sheets that can be torn away as individual sachets. These sachets may contain pills instead of powder, however, since sachets offer no protection from crushing, pills are usually distributed in blister packs.
Blister packs
Solid drugs may also be compressed into tablets or be contained within gelatin capsules, though some liquid dosages may also be taken in pill form. Pills are often distributed in blister packs, thermo-set plastic sheets with space for the drugs that are backed by a card or foil sheet. Blister packs are light and cheap to produce and have the added advantage of reminding the user that the medication has been taken by the destructive method of access.
Blister packs have been criticized as being difficult to open for many users, particularly the elderly who may suffer from dexterity issues. Indeed, in many studies comparing the experiences of those over 65 with bottles, push-through blister packs, and peel-off blisters packs, the latter is considered the most difficult to open.
However, the advantages of blister packs generally still outweigh ease-of-access concerns due to the flexibility of use and protection afforded. They can be made opaque or clear for UV protection or visibility, and are air-tight to ensure protection from humidity. The pockets that contain each pill are separated, meaning that breach or contamination does not necessarily affect all the medication.
Specialized administration packaging
Many drugs must be administered by specific routes that require tools: any drug that must be injected using a needle and syringe, inhaled into the lungs with the aid of an inhaler, dropped into the eye using a pipette, sprayed into the nose using a nebulizer, etc.
In many cases, these drugs are delivered to the end-user with the administration method incorporated into the packaging of the drug. For example, single-use disposable insulin pens incorporate a thin needle that injects the intended dose of insulin under the patients skin.
Source
- Lye, S. T. & Hwang, N. C. () Glass particle contamination: is it here to stay? Anaesthesia, 58(1).
associationofanaesthetists-publications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/.../j.-...x
- Philbert, D., Notenboom, K., Bouvy, M. L. & van Geffen, E. C. G. () Problems experienced by older people when opening medicine packaging. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 22(3).
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/.../ijpp.
- Lockhart, H. & Paine, F. A. () Packaging of Pharmaceuticals and Healthcare Products. Food Science and Nutrition, Springer.
books.google.co.uk/books
- World Health Organization () Guidelines on packaging for pharmaceutical products.
cdn.who.int/.../trs902-annex9.pdf?sfvrsn=82b4c57d_2
Manufacturing a new drug is an expensive process, especially for startups with limited resources. Thats why many biopharmaceutical and pharmaceutical startups turn to a contract manufacturing organization (CMO) to handle the process of turning a drug formula into an actual product.
Like any form of outsourcing, there can be drawbacks to using a CMO. However, it can also reduce costs, save you space, and help with overall production capacity. Heres a look at how CMOs work to help you decide if they have a role in your plan for getting your startups drug to market.
RELATED READING: Why you still need an eQMS with a contract organization
What is a contract manufacturing organization?
A contract manufacturing organization is a company that manufactures products on behalf of other companies. In the biopharmaceutical and pharmaceutical industries, CMOs are experts in large-scale manufacturing of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) and drug products. To produce FDA-regulated items such as drugs, pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies engage these organizations for their specialized drug manufacturing services. These companies can perform some or all of the duties associated with manufacturing and drug development, which may include:
- Manufacturing start to finish
- Coating the drug
- Packaging
- Labeling
- Wholesale or direct-to-consumer distribution
Contract development and manufacturing organizations
Along with CMOs, there are also contract development and manufacturing organizations (CDMOs) that provide both manufacturing and development services. Along with packaging and shipping out, CDMOs handle the formulation of the drug based on information provided by the pharmaceutical firm. Additionally, some full-service companies offer capabilities to take your new drug idea and partner with you from the pre-development stage through clinical trials and all the way to the shipment phase.
5 benefits of using a CMO
Early stage life sciences companies have many competing priorities. You have to coordinate with quality management, marketing, and other staff members while recruiting investors and attending to other duties. A CMO takes some of that off your plate, along with other benefits.
1. Reduce overall costs and time to market
They already have the needed infrastructure and technical staff, so working with a CMO or CDMO can decrease the cost of manufacturing your drugs. For example, the cost to develop a pharma manufacturing facility ranges from $10 million to $500 million. In contrast, using a CMO can range anywhere from $300,000 to $1 million per batch for a clinical trial. Ultimately, theyre many steps ahead of a startup, so your time from development to wide scale market should be infinitesimally quicker.
Want more information on Pharmaceutical Packing Material wholesaler? Feel free to contact us.
2. Scalability and flexible production capacity
A CMO is set up specifically for manufacturing and distribution. If your company has been all about research and testing, you don't have the tools or expertise in-house to suddenly transform from a laboratory to a factory. And if you do get your own facilities, you have to try and predict demand for your drug when choosing how much capacity to build. If the demand is more than you planned for, you won't be able to meet the need. If it's less, you're stuck paying for equipment, facilities and staff you don't need.
Working with a CMO lets you respond to the market instead of taking a huge gamble on it. You can produce what you need, when you need it without worrying about excess capacity. Additionally, CMOs understand the importance of quality and compliance, so you don't have to sacrifice safety for scalability.
3. Save on upgrading and maintaining equipment
If you do have your own manufacturing facility, youll have to pay to upgrade your equipment as technology advancesand that can get expensive. A CMO/CDMOs only function is to make and distribute products, so part of their core business responsibility is to update their equipment whenever its needed as well as perform maintenance. Theyll have people on staff who can operate and repair equipment, whereas a startup would have to either hire or contract with specialized maintenance teams. This frees you up to focus on other aspects of your business.
4. Ease supply chain issues
During the pandemic, there were several instances of supply chain issues, including medicine shortages. CMOs are generally better equipped than startups to handle a supply chain crisis. They have inventories already built up and longstanding relationships with suppliers and can predict issues within the supply chain. They also have the advantage of being able to shift production to another facility in the event of supply chain disruptions. Working with a CMO ensures you have a partner when production hits a slowdown or stoppage.
5. Bandwidth to focus on core competencies
When your company resources arent directly allocated to manufacturing and distribution, you have more time to focus on other tasks, like marketing your new drug, researching or working on drug discovery. When youre ready to take your drug to market, youll need to hire sales and marketing staff who can promote the product and get it into healthcare providers offices. Ideally, with less time focused on the day-to-day of manufacturing, you can allocate resources to other projects to help your company grow.
RELATED READING: 8 essential elements of pharmaceutical quality management systems
Disadvantages of working with a CMO
Using a CMO or CDMO does have its benefits, but there are a few things to keep in mind when you are choosing whether or not to work with one. These potential cons might not be a dealbreaker, but theyre something to be aware of as you make your decision.
1. Eats into your profit
Of course, using an outside partner for manufacturing needs will eat into your overall profit. Just how much the investment will cost you depends on your product and the process involved in making it. Raw materials, labor, the number of orders you need, and other factors will affect the total amount that youll pay. Providing the CMO with as much information on your product as possible can help them give you an accurate quote for their services. For small companies, the return on investment is high, given they lack the time or resources to set up a manufacturing facility, but its something to keep in mind when you are budgeting for your product launch.
2. Loss of control, possible compliance risks
No matter how much due diligence on a CMO you do ahead of time, ultimately, you cant control every aspect of how they do business. The nature of contract manufacturing means you wont have as much visibility into the manufacturing process as you would if you were performing the work yourself. A CMO may make decisions to save time or money that you would do differently. If any of these decisions mean the CMO is not compliant with cGMP regulations, your product could be at risk. With inevitable mistakes, you will most likely hear about something going wrong after the fact vs. being able to detect the potential for error ahead of time. And unfortunately, even if your CMO is responsible for a manufacturing problem, your company will most likely absorb the reputational damage.
RELATED READING: What Is cGMP in the pharmaceutical industry?
3. Ensuring a CMO is qualified and ethical
It is up to you, as the contracting company, to ensure that your CMO or CDMO operates according to all FDA regulations. If they dont, the consequences fall back on you if theres an issue during manufacturing or packaging. FDA regulations outline that you need to have responsibilities and procedures in writing and that youre legally responsible for approving the final product.
The agency continued that, while a quality agreement may help maximize compliance, the drug company sponsor is ultimately responsible for ensuring the safe manufacture of the final product released, Alan Minsk wrote in an article about warning letters from the FDA to a CMO out of compliance.
To ensure they are within compliance, set expectations from the beginning that you and the CMO need to communicate with each other frequently and that transparency on both sides is vital. Give the CMO your organizations list of key requirements for contracted organizations and let them know upfront exactly what you expect in terms of quality so that you can start off on the right foot. Keep everything stored within your quality management system so that if the FDA does come knocking, youll have everything you need to show them that you are measuring the CMOs compliance and monitoring their current good manufacturing practices.
In addition, there is always the worry of intellectual property risks when dealing with a CMO. You are basically handing access to your property to dozens of people on the other side. Even if the actual company signs an NDA and they dont compromise it, the actual workers still have the knowledge of your product and it can be leaked or misused.
4. Communication issues
Sometimes, communication breaks down within an organizationnot to mention with outside companies. If you dont create a plan for communication and stick to it, then you could end up not knowing whats going on during the manufacturing, packaging, or shipping process. So, if the CMO has delays in manufacturing and/or shipping and doesnt let you know, then youre the one fielding calls from angry customers wanting to know when they can get their product.
It is crucial to have a plan in place for how you will communicate with the CMO, including frequency and methods. You might consider designating one person from your team as the primary point of contact and set up regular video conferences or calls to touch base. In addition, you can use a quality management system (QMS) that gives you visibility into every step of the process and allows you to approve or reject products at each stage. This way, if something does go wrong, you can quickly address the issue without delaying shipments.
Do outsourcing the right way
Contract manufacturing organizations can be a great option for pharmaceutical and biotech companies looking to outsource their manufacturing needs. But as with any business relationship, there are pros and cons to consider before entering into an agreement. Finding the right partner for your product needs and committing to a thorough due diligence period will lay the foundation for a promising manufacturing relationship. The partnership between a pharmaceutical or biotech company and a CMO should feel like a two-way street with both firms working together to ensure quality and compliance.
That said, outsourcing your manufacturing operations should not detract from your company's quality and regulatory efforts. Even when working with a CMO, having our own quality management system in place allows for more visibility into the process and helps ensure that your products meet all regulatory requirements.
Some companies believe that because theyre at an earlier stage, they can essentially outsource quality management to their CMO and put off investing in QMS software. This approach will cause issues down the line. When you outsource without first developing a strong quality management system of your own, you lose precious time in establishing early operations and processes that ensure quality throughout the product development cycle. When your company is larger and more settled in its ways of doing business, outsourcing without effective quality control will slow you down.
Need an eQMS to help you scale? Check out Qualio.
For more Pharmaceutical Packing Material wholesaleinformation, please contact us. We will provide professional answers.
Comments
0